Catching Up: A Clash of Beliefs over Eel Fisheries in Sweden and the EU

When it comes to managing European eel in Sweden, the country's policies often clash with those of the EU. This study dives into these differences and why they exist. It turns out that Swedish and EU policies are based on distinct beliefs about who should be prioritized, what the problems are, and what actions should be taken. Swedish authorities give more weight to fishery groups and concerns over hydropower, while the EU is more gung-ho about closing fishing zones. The battle comes down to two opposing groups, or coalitions, fighting for influence. One coalition includes fishery organizations and local governments, and the other is made up of environmental and sport fishing groups. Guess who usually wins at the national level? Yep, the first one. This shows how powerful groups can shape policies in their favor, even when it means not fully aligning with international standards.