Is San Francisco's Progressive Identity in Jeopardy?

San Francisco's reputation as a bastion of progressive politics is being challenged. The city, once known for its liberal leanings, is shifting towards the center. This shift is reflected in the upcoming mayoral election, where only one candidate, Aaron Peskin, is running on a progressive agenda. Peskin, a member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, is an underdog in the race against incumbent Mayor London Breed and other moderate candidates. The city's slow recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to this shift. Many voters are frustrated with the city's leadership and are looking for change. The ascendant tech class, who have poured money into moderate candidates' campaigns, are also driving this shift. They want to see more punitive measures taken against the city's growing homeless population and rising crime rates. Progressivism, once a defining characteristic of San Francisco, is being redefined. Peskin's campaign promises to prioritize low-income housing, expand rent control, and increase shelter capacity for the homeless. However, his opponents argue that his approach is impractical and conservative. The question remains: what does it mean to be progressive in San Francisco today? Is it about supporting liberal policies or about being willing to defy convention? The answer lies in the policies, not the label.