Military Leaders Face Tough Choices Under Trump's Orders

The Trump administration has been using the military in ways that raise serious questions. Over the past few weeks, the president has ordered the killing of at least 64 people accused of drug trafficking. These actions might expand to include strikes in countries like Venezuela, Colombia, and Mexico. Trump claims these actions are justified because the U. S. is at war with drug trafficking organizations. Military leaders are trained to follow the law. They are taught to respect and obey legal orders. If they think an order is illegal, they can challenge it. However, they must follow the order if their legal advisors say it is lawful. Disobeying a lawful order can lead to serious consequences, including court-martial. The legality of these strikes is debated. The Justice Department says the strikes are legal. But many legal experts disagree. The U. N. High Commissioner for Human Rights says these strikes violate international law. Despite this, the military continues to carry out these orders. The legal chain of command has been filled with lawyers who support the administration's actions. This makes it less likely that orders will be deemed illegal. Military leaders are now in a tough spot. They must follow orders or risk severe penalties. Only a few may have the courage to say no. Admiral Alvin Holsey, head of the U. S. Southern Command, recently stepped down. His departure is unusual and raises questions. It is unclear if his decision is related to the controversial orders. This situation highlights the challenges military leaders face under the current administration. The big question is: What other orders might Trump give? And will the legal authorities ever say no? During his first term, Trump proposed using lethal force against protesters in Portland. General Mark Milley pushed back, but in this administration, the legal team might not support such resistance.