Voting Rights in the Balance: The SAVE Act's Constitutional Challenge

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, or SAVE Act, was approved by the House of Representatives on April 10, 2025. This bill aims to make voting more difficult for many Americans. It requires individuals to show proof of U. S. citizenship, such as a REAL ID or passport, when registering to vote in federal elections. This is not the first time such a bill has been proposed. An identical bill passed the House in July 2024, but the Senate blocked it. With the Senate and the White House now under Republican control, the SAVE Act could become law by the end of 2025. The SAVE Act would significantly change how people register to vote. State officials would need proof of citizenship before allowing someone to register. Acceptable documents include a REAL ID, U. S. passport, or military ID. A regular driver’s license would not suffice unless it shows the person was born in the U. S. or is accompanied by a birth certificate or naturalization certificate. This could create barriers, especially for low-income and minority communities, where obtaining these documents can be challenging. The Constitution does not clearly outline who can vote. It leaves this decision to the states. The original Constitution said little about voting rights. It was only through later amendments that the Constitution addressed discrimination based on race, sex, or age. The states have the power to set voter eligibility requirements for both state and federal elections. This is part of the federalist system, where states have control over their internal elections. The SAVE Act raises a crucial question: is it constitutional? By requiring proof of citizenship, Congress would be setting a qualification for voting, a power reserved for the states. Historically, some states have allowed noncitizens to vote in local elections. Today, over 20 municipalities and the District of Columbia permit permanent noncitizen residents to vote in local elections. If a state decided to extend voting rights to noncitizens, it could conflict with the SAVE Act. The politics behind the SAVE Act are clear. Noncitizen voting is a major concern for Republican politicians and voters. All cosponsors of the SAVE Act are Republicans, as were most of the representatives who voted for it. Proponents of the SAVE Act argue that Congress is acting within its powers, citing the Elections Clause. However, the Supreme Court has ruled that this clause only gives Congress the authority to regulate election procedures, not voter qualifications. The SAVE Act faces a significant constitutional hurdle. If it becomes law, the courts will need to decide its legitimacy within the country’s constitutional framework.