Was the Venezuelan Boat Attack a War Crime or Murder?

A recent incident involving a Venezuelan boat has sparked a heated debate. Some believe it was a war crime, while others think it might have been plain murder. The confusion arises from the legal framework surrounding the event. The boat was allegedly involved in drug trafficking. The U. S. government claims it was part of an armed conflict with drug gangs. However, this claim has not been publicly supported with solid evidence. If the government's argument is incorrect, then the attack could be seen as murder from the start. Even if we accept the government's perspective, the attack might still be considered a war crime. This is because the legal theory behind the attack is seen as weak and poorly constructed. Critics argue that the Secretary of Defense should be held responsible for giving such orders. The incident raises important questions about the use of force and the legal justifications behind it. It also highlights the need for transparency and accountability in government actions.