What's the Deal with DOGE and Your Social Security Data?

This: a group called DOGE wants to peek into the massive amount of personal information stored by the Social Security Administration (SSA). This data includes everything from your name and Social Security number to your health conditions and bank details. It's like a giant digital vault filled with sensitive information about almost everyone in the country. DOGE, created by former President Trump, aims to modernize government technology. However, it has faced criticism and legal challenges. The group has tried to take control of various federal agencies, sometimes causing chaos and even firing employees. Now, it's setting its sights on the SSA's data systems, which are old, complex, and interconnected. These systems are like a spiderweb—touch one part, and the whole thing might shake. The SSA's data is tightly guarded. Access is restricted, and there are strict laws to prevent misuse. But DOGE's involvement has raised concerns. For instance, Elon Musk, who leads DOGE, has made claims about the SSA paying millions of dead people. This claim is based on a limited list of personal data, which doesn't even include death dates for millions of people. Making decisions based on such incomplete information could lead to real-world problems for individuals. The SSA's data systems are not just about numbers; they reflect people's lives. Different types of Social Security numbers are assigned to US citizens, noncitizens with work authorization, and students. But people's statuses can change over time, and it's up to individuals to update the SSA. If DOGE, unfamiliar with these complexities, makes quick decisions based on outdated lists, it could affect many people. Charles Blahous, a researcher at the Mercatus Center, supports addressing Social Security's funding issues and rooting out waste. However, he worries that the current conversation about DOGE and SSA data might create misunderstandings about Social Security. He points out that improper payments in Social Security are less than 1% of the program's outlays. The SSA's data systems are housed in secure locations, and access to them has always been highly restricted. There are federal privacy laws limiting the use and dissemination of such information. These laws are designed to prevent both individual misuse and government abuse of power. Recently, the SSA's acting commissioner, Michelle King, resigned after DOGE staffers tried to access sensitive government records. Lee Dudek, another SSA employee, took her place and issued a statement about the agency's commitment to transparency and protecting benefits and information. He emphasized that DOGE personnel cannot make changes to agency systems or benefit payments and only have read access to data. Dudek also noted that DOGE must follow the law and could face prosecution if they violate it. This statement comes as former President Trump has already fired several agency inspectors general, including the acting IG for SSA, Hannibal Ware. These firings are part of ongoing legal battles. The situation is complex, and it's crucial to understand the implications of DOGE's involvement with the SSA's data. The SSA's data is a treasure trove of personal information, and any misuse could have serious consequences. It's essential to ensure that any changes or access to this data are handled with care and transparency.